Year: 2026 | Month: January-March | Volume: 10 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 46-52
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52403/gijash.20260107
Empowering Inclusion: Bridging the Gap in Assistive Technology in Low and Middle-Income Countries
Dhyanika Singh1, Sthir Prajyan Biswal2, Dr. Ranjeet Kumar3
1MPO Scholar, Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Dr. Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
2Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Dr. Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
3Workshop Manager, Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Dr, Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Corresponding Author: Dr. Ranjeet Kumar
ABSTRACT
Background: Assistive Technology (AT) is essential for improving independence, social participation, and quality of life for persons with disabilities (PWDs). Despite its benefits, only 5–15% of people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have access to AT, primarily due to high costs, limited trained professionals, weak infrastructure, and inadequate policy frameworks. This gap contributes to exclusion, poverty, and poor health outcomes.
Objectives: This paper aims to examine systemic barriers to AT access in LMICs and propose a framework to improve affordability, availability, appropriateness, and quality of AT services.
Methods: A comprehensive review of global and LMIC-specific data sources (e.g., WHO, Namibia, Malawi, Zambia) was performed. Through thematic synthesis, key risk factors were identified, and the analysis evaluated policy frameworks, workforce development strategies, procurement mechanisms, the application of Universal Design principles, and digital innovation approaches.
Results: The review highlights significant systemic barriers: inadequate public financing, fragmented governance, and poorly functioning procurement and distribution systems. Over 75% of low-income countries lack structured prosthetics and orthotics training programs, resulting in a shortage of skilled professionals. Limited awareness among communities and healthcare providers further reduces AT uptake. Promising enablers include integration of Universal Design principles, digital platforms for service delivery, and regulatory frameworks to standardize AT provision.
Conclusions: Strengthening AT access in LMICs requires a comprehensive, multisectoral approach. A five-pillar roadmap is proposed: (1) Empowering people through awareness and inclusion, (2) Enabling policy via national health integration, (3) Tailoring affordable products for local contexts, (4) Expanding service provision to underserved regions, and (5) Enhancing personnel capacity through formal training and international collaboration. Implementation of this roadmap, alongside innovative financing and global partnerships, is critical to bridging the AT access gap and ensuring equitable inclusion of PWDs worldwide.
Keywords: Assistive Technology, Universal Design, LMICs, multisectoral policy, AT workforce, digital innovation, funding mechanisms.
[PDF Full Text]